{"id":633,"date":"2014-02-03T19:36:57","date_gmt":"2014-02-03T19:36:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/?p=633"},"modified":"2014-02-03T19:36:57","modified_gmt":"2014-02-03T19:36:57","slug":"snapshots-in-my-mind","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/?p=633","title":{"rendered":"Snapshots in my mind."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On my current project, I&#8217;m exploring the new snapshots feature in FCP 10.1.1. It&#8217;s one of those features that, at first, seems like a small addition. But in practical usage, I&#8217;m finding that it&#8217;s a huge shift in how I think about versioning.<\/p>\n<p>In FCP 7 and prior, I would duplicate timelines to create versions. When too many timelines were in my project, I would duplicate the project if it had grown too large. Then I&#8217;d trash old versions to decrease the file size and move forward.<\/p>\n<p>In previous versions of FCP X, I would duplicate the timeline and append a v2, v3, v4, and so on at the end of each day or notes pass. On the next day I&#8217;d continue on with the duped and updated version. Dupes represented both archives AND new versions.<\/p>\n<p>But with 10.1, things are a flipped around.\u00a0Here&#8217;s a graphical explanation of the switch.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Versioning Method<\/strong> (past versions of FCP)<strong>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-635\" alt=\"Versioning method\" src=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method-1024x128.jpg\" width=\"640\" height=\"80\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method-1024x128.jpg 1024w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method-300x38.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method-768x96.jpg 768w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method-690x86.jpg 690w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method-980x123.jpg 980w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Versioning-method.jpg 1104w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><strong>Snapshot Method<\/strong> (Current Version 10.1+)<strong>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Snapshot-method1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-637\" alt=\"Snapshot method\" src=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Snapshot-method1.jpg\" width=\"682\" height=\"409\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Snapshot-method1.jpg 682w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Snapshot-method1-300x180.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 682px) 100vw, 682px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Since creating snapshots breaks the links to multiclips and compound clips, I want to keep working and moving &#8220;forward&#8221; in my most current, non-snapshot version.<\/p>\n<p>But now I&#8217;m at an impasse. I want to branch off from my current cut and create a very different version. This B version will be based on client notes and I&#8217;ll be comparing it against my original version. I&#8217;ll more than likely want to pull something from the A version and B version to create a final C version. And so&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Duplication Method:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-636\" alt=\"Duplication method\" src=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Duplication-method.jpg\" width=\"640\" height=\"350\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Duplication-method.jpg 781w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Duplication-method-300x164.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Duplication-method-768x421.jpg 768w, http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Duplication-method-690x378.jpg 690w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m honestly a little confused about this. Is it best to make dupes at this point or should I work from a snapshot?<\/p>\n<p>My gut says that I should dupe to start cutting a new version. This way, when I combine the two to make a version C, all the links back to the multiclips and compound clips will remain the same. So the new rule would be: use snapshots on current versions. Use duplicates on notes passes.<\/p>\n<p>What I like about the new snapshot system is that I keep working with one version of the timeline while &#8220;dropping off&#8221; old versions of it behind me. Yeah, let&#8217;s just go ahead and call them &#8220;project droppings.&#8221; Or perhaps I could work a little less blue and call them archives. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>This is a new way for me think about my project timeline. It makes the current project more important as it becomes the primary place I work for longer periods of time, as opposed to duping and starting fresh every day. I like that. Notice that there is currently only one primary project in the picture below.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Screen-Shot-2014-02-03-at-11.00.06-AM.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-640\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2014-02-03 at 11.00.06 AM\" src=\"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Screen-Shot-2014-02-03-at-11.00.06-AM-1024x274.png\" width=\"640\" height=\"171\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m also learning as I go here. If any of you have different ideas on ways to use snapshots vs. dupes, please feel free to comment below. I have a feeling that there will be some interesting use case scenarios popping up in the future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On my current project, I&#8217;m exploring the new snapshots feature in FCP 10.1.1. It&#8217;s one of those features that, at first, seems like a small addition. But in practical usage, I&#8217;m finding that it&#8217;s a huge shift in how I think about versioning. In FCP 7 and prior, I would duplicate timelines to create versions. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[101,132,134,58,55,135,133],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/633"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=633"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/633\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":655,"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/633\/revisions\/655"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.garbershop.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}